Help for not for profit and charity trustees

The composition of boards

I was chatting to one of the other stallholders at the NEC exhibition and the discussion got onto the people on the board of her charity which was engaged in the medical field. In an earlier post I discussed the issue of lived experience, a popular topic at present with advice along the lines that it was important for boards to have such people. It turned out that all the board members at one time had the medical condition the charity was concerned with. It had not turned out well. Gradually, they had left and the board now had a mixed membership and only one or two members were people with the condition.

As I said in the earlier post, the nature of what a board does is only partly to do with the day to day operations of the organisation. This may seem a strange, even odd, statement to make but I suggest that the bulk of discussions at a board meeting are not directly linked to its operations on the ground. It is concerned with the finances, governance and safety issues, policy formation and updating, communications and staffing issues. In one sense, it almost doesn’t matter what the charity is doing.

It would be silly to argue that there is no input concerning its operations – clearly there has to be. It is also important for staff and volunteers to think that the trustees are tuned into their concerns and issues. It is not uncommon for staff and volunteers say things like ‘the trustees don’t understand what we do’ or to feel they are, as a body, detached and out of touch. Inviting them to make presentations from time to time is a good idea if managed well. I mean that anyone making a presentation should be encouraged to go beyond simply saying ‘I did that and then I did something else’. Rather that they try and relate their experience to the strategy of the charity or possibly for the need for change in some form, or how things could be improved.

I have reread some of the advice on this topic and I stick to my view that it has dangers and that it does not properly reflect the true role of the board.

One response to “The composition of boards”

  1. […] What were the trustees’ role in this? Did they know and if so did they ask questions? Or was this a case of ‘founder syndrome’ where the personality of the founder so dominates its management that the trustees just become cyphers? No doubt in time we shall find out. This is one of the issues I discuss in my book. […]

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: